by Chas Bonner
Conventional wisdom says the two words are oxymorons.
After all, virtually all governments are trying to impose environmental controls, cap and trade programs, water use reduction, sewage clean up, and more. The Kyoto treaty was one of the first world-wide treaties committing many countries to global warming initiatives (and the U.S. was non-signatory to that treaty). Then there was a similar treaty in 2009 in Copenhagen which was a flop. A year later a climate meeting was held in Cancun, and few showed up. The latest one was in Durban, South Africa in November, and nothing substantial resulted. In short, few governments, let alone the U.N., have been effective in forcing climate control on any country.
However, business has seen much more positive results. The accounting firm of Ernst & Young recently quizzed heads of 300 international companies, and surprisingly, 83% of them were in favor of legally binding treaties to mitigate global warming. Even more surprising, most of them were already investing heavily in the arena, AND on a profitable basis. Improved energy consumption has been the most notable, but reduction in waste has also proven profitable. Being “Green” is making green.
As an example, Wal-Mart intensely planned out their transport system, and reportedly are now saving about $200 million per year. Tesco, the big British supermarket firm has taken similar steps, and claims to be saving almost $300 million per year. The Carbon Disclosure Project which charts energy emissions of over 500 large companies now reports that 59% of energy efficiency projects undertaken will be profitable within 3 years---a 33% rate of return. That is profitability.
Closer to home, Scythe & Spade was hired to manage a very large farm in Central Idaho which was a mess, and after wells, pumps, sprinkler systems, ditches, etc. were repaired and revamped, return on the farm more than doubled, much of that due to water savings.
A HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL!
Recent Comments